now browsing by author
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has proposed $344 million in financial assistance to Pakistan+ including $100 million in foreign military funding, a massive $190 million reduction in grant+ as compared to the 2016 fiscal.
“Pakistan plays a key role in US counter-terrorism strategy, the peace process in Afghanistan, nuclear non-proliferation efforts, and stability and economic integration in South and Central Asia. It is also a large and growing economy offering profitability for US businesses,” the State Department said in its annual budget proposals sent to the US Congress.
In the maiden budget of the Trump administration, the State Department said that it will maintain a robust diplomatic presence that will enable continued bilateral cooperation on the many joint US-Pakistan interests, and bolster stability in this strategically important country.
The State Department has proposed $344 million in financial assistance and grant to Pakistan including $100 million in foreign military funding, which is used for sale of military hardware.
Last year, the US assistance to Pakistan under the State Department budget was $534 million, which included $225 million towards foreign military funding.
In all, the State Department has proposed a massive $190 million reduction in its financial assistance to Pakistan as compared with the 2016 fiscal. The current 2017 fiscal would end on September 30 this year.
In addition to State Department’s financial assistance, Pakistan also receives reimbursement from the Pentagon every year for its expenses towards US operations in Afghanistan.
However, after Afghanistan, Pakistan continues to be the second largest aid recipient of the US in South Asia.
For instance, the State Department has proposed a $200 million aid to support its long-term stability and broader security and stability in the region.
HONG KONG: Speaking at the University of Maryland, Yang Shuping, a graduating senior from China, sprinkled her upbeat commencement speech with observations that drew warm applause: The air was far cleaner in the United States than in China, she said, and she could openly discuss racism, sexism and politics in ways that she had never before dreamed possible.
Growing up in China, “I was convinced that only authorities owned the narrative,” Yang, a theater and psychology major from the southern city of Kunming, told the crowd in a basketball arena in College Park, Maryland. “Only authorities could define the truth.”
The speech Sunday drew harsh criticism, however, from some of Yang’s Chinese classmates in Maryland and from legions of social media users in China, many of whom accused her of selling out her homeland. Even the city of Kunming weighed in, saying in a message on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like platform, that her comments about the city’s air pollution were “not related to us.”
On Monday, Yang said she hoped the speech would not result in any personal attacks against her.
“I apologize if my speech was at any points misleading,” she wrote on Weibo. “I sincerely hope I can be understood and forgiven by the public.”
“The speech was just sharing a part of my experience studying in the United States,” she added. “There was no intention to belittle my country and my hometown.”
The episode appeared to show how, as more Chinese study overseas, comments that they make about China or its one-party government can spread online and prompt taunts, even threats, from other students or social media users back home.
There were 328,547 students from China studying at US higher-education institutions during the academic year that ended in 2016, nearly one-third of all international students in the country, according to data published by the Institute of International Education, a nonprofit organization based in Washington. That figure was about double the number of students in the United States from India, which ranked second on the institute’s list.
In a separate study that cited data from China’s Education Ministry, the consultancy ICEF Monitor said that 523,700 Chinese students had gone abroad to study in 2015, up from fewer than 300,000 in 2010. The study said that as many as 80 percent of the Chinese students who went abroad typically returned to China to work.
The Maryland episode is hardly the first time that a student or professor at an overseas university has provoked complaints back in China. Earlier this month, for example, a lecturer from Monash University in Australia was suspended after a Chinese student complained on Weibo of a classroom quiz that had appeared to insult Chinese officials.
In 2010, the University of Calgary announced that China’s Education Ministry had removed it from its list of accredited overseas institutions. The decision came weeks after the Canadian university had awarded an honorary degree to the Dalai Lama, whom the Chinese government accuses of promoting Tibetan independence from China.
A planned speech next month by the Dalai Lama at the University of California, San Diego, has already prompted the local chapter of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association to threaten “tough measures to resolutely resist the school’s unreasonable behavior.”
In her speech Sunday, Yang said she had been relieved to find that she did not need to wear any of her five pollution masks in the United States. She also discovered, she said, that the freedoms enshrined in the Declaration of Independence were not the abstractions she had once imagined.
A brief outline of the two projects was made available in the administration’s maiden annual budget on Tuesday, which indicated that the ‘New Silk Road’ project would be a public-private initiative in which India would be an important player.
The state department said the budgetary request of its south and central Asia will support the two initiatives: the New Silk Road (NSR) focused on Afghanistan and its neighbours, and the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor linking South Asia with Southeast Asia.
This request will be leveraged through side-by-side collaboration with regional countries, other bilateral donors, multilateral development banks, and the private sector.
It said “the importance of…the NSR grows” as the transition in Afghanistan continues and the US “strives to help the Afghan people succeed and stand on their own.”
The state department said it will deepen support for the objectives through “far-reaching” public diplomacy programmes.
According to James McBride of the Council on Foreign Relations, the NSR refers to a suite of joint investment projects and regional trade blocs that have the potential to bring economic growth and stability to Central Asia.
“Following the surge of 30,000 additional troops into Afghanistan in 2009, which President Barack Obama’s administration had hoped would lay the groundwork for complete withdrawal a few years later, Washington began to lay out a strategy for supporting these initiatives through diplomatic means,” McBride said.
Announcing her vision for a New Silk Road, Clinton had said in Chennai: “Turkmen gas fields could help meet both Pakistan’s and India’s growing energy needs and provide significant transit revenues for both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Tajik cotton could be turned into Indian linens. Furniture and fruit from Afghanistan could find its way to the markets of Astana or Mumbai and beyond.”